Kaboom,
Yeah, I've heard many of the same things today. There does seem to be some backpeddling on the Superdome, but I guess time will tell.
LSU would seem to be a logical place for the Saints to play but I wonder how many people would actually attend. Pro football would probably not be high on anyones priorities at the moment. They should probably try a game or two there just to judge the fan reaction but not be surprised if its low and maybe just play the rest of the games on the road. That may be a good way of making a few bucks for the relief effort.
"I hear somewhere that because of the land erosion that happens all the time around the area, that in 50-100 years, the ocean would be in downtown New Orleans anyway, so it would be useless to rebuild it in the exact place. I think it might of been CNN where I heard this. This week's Time goes into some of this as well."
This is only a small part of what is known about the geology of N.O. A brief synopsis. When N.O. was founded about 250 years ago by the French, N.O. was about 9 ft. above sea level. The problem is that N.O. is built on silt. I don't know if you know what that is but it is very fine soil that was placed there by periodic flooding (I know you've seen it, just go down to a local river or stream bank and you'll find lots of it). Its advantage is that its very fertile, you can grow lots of really good crops on it, but its disadvantage is that its not good for building on. When you build on it, it dries out and compacts. The compaction leads to a lowered topography, which is exactly why N.O. is in its present situation. The last statistic I saw, several years ago, was that, on average, N.O. is sinking at a rate of about 1/8 in. per year (some places more, some less).
"so it would be useless to rebuild it in the exact place."
This is my point exactly. We're going to spend roughly $200 billion just to clean up the mess and we may see 10,000 people dead. If the pols and special interests get their way, we'll spend another $200 billion (probably way more) to rebuild it. Next month, year, decade there will be another Cat 4 or 5 that will come along and wipe it out again. Does that make sense? Not to me.
Our options are to either move N.O. somewhere else (not likely), disperse the population (thats already been done) and rebuild only a small section of it (basically the French Quarter and the port), or let it go back to what it has been (the worst choice).
What will happen? We'll thats basically up to us. Every pol thats even brought up the thought of not rebuilding has been castigated to no end (Dennis Hastert, R-ILL and Speaker of the House, was the first that I heard of to bring up the subject and he had to apologize). And he's not the only one.
Thats why I said a few posts ago that I can virtually guarantee that we're not going to learn a darn thing from this. We're going to go through this again, and again.