• New threads will not be visible until approved by a moderator.
  • Customize your forum experience with the xenForo-G-1-0 browser script.
    For additional information, see: Useful Custom Forum Script: xenForo-G-1-0

  • Welcome to the forum!
    You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
    Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
    Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
  • You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
    Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
    Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!

Celebrity Videos - cleaned

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,928
Reaction score
361
Mathew Rolston for Instyle Magazine

One of the most common and infuriating mistakes regards the Rolston/Bellucci work for Instyle. It's always lumped together. This is incorrect.
This shot is from a 2001 set which seems lost. There were at least 3 other shots but they are nowhere to be found



This set is called Black Magic. It was shot in 2010. Look at them carefully. Beyond the fact that clothes and styling are entirely different you can see the clear age difference.



There is nothing quite so dumb as a man on the internet.
 
Last edited:

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,928
Reaction score
361


Took me just over 10 seconds to search on Google and find this better version of the image I just dumped because it was so small and grainy
I get that some images are rare, but seriously. 10 seconds on Google. GOOGLE! Have some damned pride.
 

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,928
Reaction score
361
Posting standards in the picture section

It's not exactly an amazing picture to warrant posting no matter what format, in fact I doubt I would have bothered, but it literaly took me 6 seconds to find this better version via Google (F***ing GOOGLE!!!) and 3 of those were taken up opening a new browser window.


For Heaven's sake! Have some pride in what you are doing. Considering the imagetwist profit motive, I may start to consider people who post absolute crap as spammers.
BOC
 
Top