Celebrity Videos - cleaned

[blueoystercult]

Ah. Subjective interpretation. I draw my learned friend's attention to my previous statement
"We end up clearing half of it as junk because it doesn't meet even the most liberal interpretation of the above rule"
Oh yes. Heigl. The picture the main focus of which was her bloody husband in the foreground, while you can just about make Heigl out in the background in what looks like her granny's bra. The bloody thing was so big it could well have passed for a crop top.But the main focus of the shot is still the morose bearded dude in the shorts and T-shirt. And what are this fabulous couple who personify sex appeal doing? Glaring off into the distance with expressions on their faces like someone had just farted.
Yes. A hairy man in scrappy shorts and a T-shirt. Sexy.
FFS.
BOC

 

[1man]

33rd Annual Paleyfest Los Angeles ‘An Evening with Dick Wolf’ (March 19, 2016)

 

[blueoystercult]

This is a NUDE celebrity forum. The standards are different here. If you want a forum that approves any and all pictures there are plenty on the net. Please do feel free to avail yourself of them
I didn't set the standards but I do have to apply them. They have been relaxed since they were first imposed but all moderators spend bloody hours discussing and debating what we can and can't leave up and they are constantly being moulded and modified.
As for Heigl, a top that covers her from her collar bone to her solar plexus does not constitute "a good view of her funbags", and if she is in the background and the foreground is dominated by her hairy husband in his scabby boardies, then she is not the focus of the shot. What part of "...images must have 'sex-appeal'" is unclear? Unless of course you find bearded men or a couple who look like they've been arguing for hours sexy. But hey. Whatever blows your skirt up.

 

[blueoystercult]

If cow guts and gorrillas are the things that glitter your chandelier, I'm sure there's a forum or website somewhere out there to cater for you. However, what part of "not on this forum" is in anyway unclear to you? Just because you want it doesn't mean it should be available here.
This forum has specific rules and standards that make it unlike other run of the mill celebrity fora, of which there are thousands and all of which you are at liberty to avail yourself at any time. There you can find pictures of celebrities in full apparel, in company, alone, shopping for salad or washing their hands. You can find all those tiny pointless selfies of them having coffee, or meaningless pap galleries of them walking down a street. Those are the appropriate spaces for those kinds of images and you can apply your "selective view" or "limited perspective" or rampant imagination or anything else you care to. It doesn't happen here even if it is what makes your ovaries ache.
I have hundreds, maybe thouands of images of actresses, singers, dancers, models and others by top photographers, all of which will never be posted here because they do not satisfy board criteria. Sometimes they are a part of larger photosets, some of which do fit the criteria. In that case I post the images that do with the full gallery on the imagehost and I leave a note so members know they should explore. Above all however, I observe the rule and boundary of the board. It's not rocket science. That is the true nature of selectivity as it applies to a specfic space and respects the rules of that space. "Do as you will is the whole of the law" does not apply here. Nor should it.
No one is holding a gun to your head or begging you to stay.
You choose to come here, you respect the rules and conditions of the arena, whether that is in what you are posting or what you find. We will continue to apply the rules of the forum to any and all posts made here, and interpret those rules and how they apply to the best of our ability, in consultation with each other where necessary.
You want something else, you go elsewhere. You want to post something else, post it elsewhere. Any breaches of those rules and boundaries which define this forum will be dealt with appropriately.
It really is as simple and straightforward as that.
BOC

F... the bearded dude, what part of "learn a selective view" is unclear?
I would still have taken the picture even if a gorilla sits besides here and she would be holding cow guts instead of her dog.
I glad I still get notifications and can judge myself.

 

[paranormal]

Keeley Hazell - Cashback





Matroska - File Format
245 MB - File Size
00:09:14 - Duration
1920 - Width
816 - Height


https://www.bigfile.to/file/6bs9BVQ5KgPH/4c.rar

 

[paranormal]

Jaime Pressly - Ringmaster




Matroska - File Format
102 MB - File Size
00:03:16 - Duration
720 - Width
400 - Height


https://www.bigfile.to/file/dKmBhYVPvvXj/5c.rar

 

[paranormal]

Jaime Pressly - 100 Girls "Lingerie"




Matroska - File Format
112 MB - File Size
00:03:16 - Duration
1280 - Width
718 - Height


https://www.bigfile.to/file/7Nmd6FMv6wRp/7c.rar

 

[paranormal]

Emmanuelle Chriqui - 100 Girls




Matroska - File Format
124 MB - File Size
00:03:35 - Duration
1280 - Width
718 - Height


https://www.bigfile.to/file/e6cMttY37W2Q/8c.rar

 

[paranormal]

Tia Carrere - Wayne's World




Matroska - File Format
113 MB - File Size
00:05:46 - Duration
1920 - Width
1080 - Height

https://www.bigfile.to/file/cDgT5t5Ttq3k/9c.rar

 

[blueoystercult]

..

 

[blueoystercult]

Thanks. No you mention it a banner makes perfect sense.
(2) That's all true, but it's also why it's important (imo) for things to be clear and consistent to all. Contention usually arises because of some perceived inconsistency. That always has the potential to mushroom if your governing rule or guideline is entirely subjective. A group of communicating moderators all judging more or less from the same agreed base line largely eradicates that problem. Otherwise this person decides this, that person decides that, nothing makes sense and everyone gets bent out of shape. That's no fun for anyone.
(3) Anything's worth a try.

 

[blueoystercult]

Yes I know.
But this goes back to an old problem. Originally I was told caps could not be duplicated in the picture section. I still have an (expired) infraction on my account for making caps of a scene available in the video section even though my stills were mine and differed from those available (last stills I ever made or posted here)
Then I was told by admin that stills available in the video section could also be posted in the pictures section. Hence my approving this post.
So which is it and what should I do, please?
BOC

 

[Vidman01]

Valerie Hartman gets wild during seks in "Sleepaway Camp 2', in HD 1080p quality!
Download from my own server or from depositfiles. Enjoy Valerie!!



1920x1080 / 2:41 / 117 mb:
http://www.nudeactresses.eu/free/vh1080.rar
or
http://depositfiles.com/files/7bjaytd97

rar pass: nudeactresses.org

Check out my site. Clips you won't find anywhere else!

 

[1man]

Reese Witherspoon’s 40th Birthday Party at Warwick Nightclub (March 19, 2016)

 

[1man]

‘Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice’ Premiere in New York (March 20, 2016)

 

[SceneUpDD]

Trish Stratus Vs Stacy Keibler - Wwf Catfight

​

 

[BlazerLady]

Info:

Size: 60,3 MB | Name: Ariana Grande - Dangerous Woman (A Cappella) | Extension: mp4 | Duration: 00:03:57 | Resolution: 1280x720

Ariana Grande - Dangerous Woman (A Cappella)

 

[Jony 07]

Courteney Cox / Friends S08Ep20 / (US 2001)



duration 00:55 size 64.4 mkv 1920 x 1080
C.C.F.8.20.rar

 

[IamoR]

Full Frontal with bush in Vinyl Tv Series

 

[BlazerLady]

Info:

Size: 107,2 MB | Name: Megan Fox - New Girl, S05E09 (2016) | Extension: mkv | Duration: 00:03:00 | Resolution: 1280x720

Megan Fox - New Girl, S05E09 (2016 )