• New threads will not be visible until approved by a moderator.
  • Customize your forum experience with the xenForo-G-1-0 browser script.
    For additional information, see: Useful Custom Forum Script: xenForo-G-1-0

  • Welcome to the forum!
    You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
    Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
    Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
  • You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
    Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
    Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!

Celebrity Videos - cleaned

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
Latest exchange.

blueoystercult said:
Personally I think all you have done is swap one set of nightmares for another. However, in the interest of fairness I put your messages to me together with a proposal to the entire moderation staff and administrators that we postpone the removal of Imagetwist as an approved host and take a few weeks to evaluate the changes.
Thus far the only response from ANYONE in a position of respnsibility on this board has been to call me nuts and to insinuate something averse in my "about turn".
I understand that you are running an enterprise and trying to make money from it, but other hosts like Imgbox and ShareNXS manage to do so without being intrusive and aggressive and pissing everyone off.
Why can't you?
BOC


hp_imagetwist said:
So what do you think on the change i made ? I did not got any response from you on a positive step i took.

Regards

Best friend my pale hairy arse.
BOC
 

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
Copied in so you know what I'm about and no one can insinuate I've lost my senses or am taking back handers.

blueoystercult said:
Fairly simple really.
Your ads unfold like clown car and operate like a brute force attack. Not on every page which is why I have never swapped out every file posted on Imagetwist, but enough for me to get hacked off and turn it into a fight. I'm an obstinate bastard which doesn't make me too popular, but since I tend to get very pissed off about things that make sense people know why and they run with it.
All the ads in Imgbox, SNXS, ImgBam, even Imagevenue, can be blocked or shunted and they don't interfere with the normal loading of the page or harm the user's machine. Ever. Put simply, Imagetwist forces ads down our throats. The other hosts do not. Yours are the only pages whose ads have triggered averse responses from AV and Spybot; and no one has ever complained about other hosts' pages crashing anything.
As I wrote in the response to one of our members I sent to you, the chances are these ad scripts and codes may be automatic and the host site [you] doesn't check them, but that does not absolve you of the responsibility.
As an aside, most of those hosts store in galleries which is useful to forum posters. You do not. Most of those hosts do not rename their files when one clicks "save image as" or whatever. Imagetwist does. These are small niggles. Having ads rammed down our throats and our computers and phones crashing when we open certain pages hosted by Imagetwist is more than just a pain in the backside.
You want to know why we prefer those hosts to yours and I'm telling you. You can get pissed off about it or you can listen. There is a balance between profitability and complete loss and that is what you are facing because you have operated with this single mindedness for ages and refused to discuss things. I have used yor "contact us" page three times to bring this up with no reply. Now suddenly it's come to bite you on the arse and you want to talk. Where the hell were you months ago when I started sending yor company messages about this?
Here's the simple truth. You can have lots of little or you can have bugger all of loads. The bottom line as we stand right now is that while I have put things before the rest of the board for open minded discussion
so that everyone can see and evaluate how your changes work and how this new regime of communication between us stands, and while it is my intention that we have then a frank discussion and decide from there as a group as it should be, my inclination when we begin to discuss things is still to dump Imagetwist like a hot rock.
However. I'm still grown up enough and open minded enough to give things some time and a chance to see where you go with it.
BOC

hp_imagetwist said:
Why you keep comparing imgbox or sharenxs with imagetwist, we both follow different way of work.


They have 3-4ads including 1 popup 1-2 banners. They don't track each visit source, affiliate system, numbers money and everything. Thus database don't put that much load on there servers and i am ready to bet my 7 experience that we have better server config than them. And they don't share a penny with you.


I follow totally different program, I share my 70% revenue with similar or an extra advertisement system which i need to run. My database have tons of load than them cause of this system. To balance the load we have best cpu available in world.

Site you are comparing me with went down for weeks , we don't.

They have less ads cause they don't pay users anything. They are fast cause they don't have to track anything which we need to. They can offer hotlinking, we cannot.

However, I still try to keep things better, I have best server, only problem i am facing is with ads. I have tried to kept as low as possible keeping in mind about expenses i have. I know i had network ads which can show you anything from mackeeper to adult cams to any software. But a adult cam promotion is i think fair and clean promotion.


I know i still have to get rid of full page "continue to image" but give me time, I am trying my best to get rid of it but i need a buyer for IM ad which is hard to find due to limited number of advertisers.


Thank you for it ( about decision) I am trying my best.
 

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
blueoystercult said:
A couple of points.
My browsers (I use Firefox AND Chrome to give me the best read on what forum members are seeing and experiencing) are set up to clear all caches each time they are closed. Everything. No automatic sign ins, no stored passwords, no remembered history or cookies. All gone. I do this for security, for stability of the programs, and to ensure that each time I open a link or a page it is not disrupted by something from past sessions.
On the machine used for moderation I have activated standard plug-ins and standard free protections because this is the most likely common setup used by the majority. I have not gone hunting for anything special. Just used the most popular for each browser. Again, this will show me what, if any, problems are being experienced by forum users.
It's not EVERY page. It has, historically, been a sufficient number of pages for me to begin to take action when it became clear that no one from Imagetwist would respond to my messages. Opening one page now wouldn't particularly make any difference if the history is anything to go by. This is why I proposed a hiatus on decisions so that your changes could be evaluated over time and in total, and not just on one page or one browsing session. We must be sure that the changes are consistent and long term and not just enough to shut us up for now.
As for Larry, he has been involved in these discussions for weeks and has never once mentioned you. To my knowledge none of the other image moderators are aware you are even a member here. Had they been then I'm sure they would have spoken to you directly. Interstingly I and other moderators for some time carried images in our post signatures similar to this



Given how prolific we are on the board, it's a little surprising you were unaware.
Beyond that I cannot comment except to say I tried on my own to start a dialogue with your company on several occasions and got nowhere.
I was not looking for instantaneous fixes then. I'm not looking for instantaneous fixes now. The removal of Imagetwist as a host here has been a point of discussion for months. I began swapping out your intrusive links on 2nd September 2015 when Spybot alerted me to yet another trojan buried in one of the bundled ads and my patience snapped.
I don't think you're evil. I think you set up a business model to make you money. I think you make agreements with ad companies who add scripts and code to your pages and you never properly examined what those scripts and codes were. I think that you arrogantly thought that no forum would ever stop you since the posters were getting their fractions of a penny per click. It never occurred to you that moderators on a forum would be sufficiently angry to remove you as a host, and now you see that as a very real possibility and you recognise that where one forum goes others usually follow.
Now here is something for you to think about. All this time I spend on getting things right for this forum. I am not paid a penny for any of it. I didn't even take up the offer of file host memberships. Nothing. I am one of the more prolific posters. I have never, ever, stored a single image on your host despite your "pay incentive" And why? Because the negatives outweigh that one positive and I will not put members at risk to make a few pennies for myself.
I have no stake in this game beyond the best possible forum as risk free as I can make it for all our members to enjoy. That is my responsibility and I take it seriously.
I try to be a resonable, sensible person, and look for compromise where I can. This is why I have suggested to moderators and administrators that we postpone action to evaluate your changes over a period and discuss it between us before taking that final step. In the meantime I am perfectly happy to discuss the matter with you to explore solutions, though I should in the interest of full disclosure make it clear that I am making our discussion available to all moderators.
That remains my best possible compromise position on this matter for now.
BOC


hp_imagetwist said:
Okay your experience has been bad with us i accept. I want you to please click a url of our right now. With both adblock OFF and ON.

I want you to share your experience on what you see right now. Please clean cookiee.


I accept i had 1 popup which was visible to adblock users from past 3 months cause adblock number was huge and it was affecting revenue since i was paying my affiliates for every visitor. BUT we removed that code 3-4 days ago before talking to you.

So i think your whole experience of forcing ad even with blocker is based on that which is removed and it won't go up. I removed it cause i came to know by a friend in ad network who make me understand that showing ad to a user who already uses adblock is worth nothing. They will not buy anything cause they already using adblock and it will make more harm then profit. So i removed it.


So 2 changes i made are: Removed ads for users running adblockers

Removed network popup. i hope removing "full page" ad will make things lot better.




About contacting us, I know you will not believe me but i never saw any msg from you or anyone regarding this. When i came to know 2-3 days ago that some mod is deleting links, I contacted you. I did not knew that there was a plan to remove us but i contacted you at very moment that user contacted me through live chat.



I know you think i am some evil or something but trust me i have always tried to be friendly with everyone, Help webmasters out, listen to their complaints, I even listen to a small blog owner if he wants me to ban someone. I have kept larry and many other webmaster on my skype, why ? To video chat with them ?

No, so that i can insta listen to their problem and insta fix it. That's the reason i asked yours. I have told larry many times in past that if you need me to ban any spammer or anyone he can tell me. He even contacted me in past just once and i fixed it in minutes. I always though if a mod have any problem, he will contact me through larry or here on boards ,Thats why i am registered here from years.

Anyway that's all from my side. I know you will think i made up most of this, but i am exactly you want me to. you will find me on every board, most of the popular image host won't even care to do that.


Regards.

Still think I'm a crazy person backtracking or allowing himself to be bribed?
FFS
 
Last edited:

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349

deepenigma

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
2,247
Last edited by a moderator:

Ruffah

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
6,166
Reaction score
2,268
Ana de la Reguera, Angelica Blandon, Vicky Rueda, Margarita Rosa de Francisco @ Paraiso Travel (MX 2008) [butt]



Title : Ana_de_la_Reguera_Angelica_Blandon_Vicky_Rueda_Margarita_R.D_Francisco_-_Paraiso_Travel-(MX2008)-RUFFAH.rar - 187 MiB
Duration : 7mn 33s
Res : 720 x 400 @ 29.970 fps
Video : XVID @ 2 993 Kbps
Audio : ac3 448 Kbps@48.0 KHz
Channels : 6 channels

Download:

http://Dead Link Removed.net/file/m7cp8mvd/
or
Dead Link Removed

.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ruffah

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
6,166
Reaction score
2,268

Ana de la Reguera, Ana Ciocceti, Ingrid Martz @ Así del Precipicio (MX 2006) [full frontal]



Title : Ana_de_la_Reguera_Ana_Ciocceti_Ingrid_Martz_-_Asi_del_Precipicio-(MX2006)-RUFFAH.rar - 278 MiB
Duration : 11mn 41s
Res : 720 x 400 @ 29.970 fps
Video : XVID @ 2 993 Kbps
Audio : ac3 320 Kbps@48.0 KHz
Channels : 6 channels

Download:

http://Dead Link Removed.net/file/lfu3bil7/
or
Dead Link Removed

.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
Esquire 2006 B-Roll

Ph: Sheryl Nields
Additional B-roll and test shots from this excellent series. Much smaller than the print shots but worth having IMO






This is a large gallery of 30 images. Some images were not included because of forum rules (including one headshot that is very much worth seeing) and some because they are sequential and so very similar to each other. The nice thing about hosts with galleries is you can be selective about the frames you post but give members everything in the gallery for completeness.
 
Last edited:

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
Click on all Imagetwist's current pages to see the results of the last few days' negotiations
Turn on your adblockers and you'll see better.
I still think there should be a lengthy probation period to be sure this isn't a temporary ploy to shut us up, but I'd venture to suggest this represents job done. At least for now.
Anything else?
BOC
 

Ruffah

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
6,166
Reaction score
2,268


Louise Bourgoin @ Je Suis un Soldat (FR 2015) [full frontal]




Title : Louise_Bourgoin_-_Je_Suis_Un_Soldat-(FR2015)-RUFFAH.avi - 53.1 MiB
Duration : 2mn 51s
Res : 720 x 400 @ 25.000 fps
Video : XVID @ 2 430 Kbps
Audio : aac 155 Kbps@48.0 KHz
Channels : 2 channels

Download:

http://Dead Link Removed.net/file/7x33jkfz/
or
Dead Link Removed

.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
I took the same view which is why I approved them. The post is still there.
TBH this is one of those issues that grates my nerps, not least because I still have an infraction, albeit expired, on my record for making caps and posting them because they were "duplicates" (even though they were cropped and rebalanced) of material available in the video section.
Still. Something comes up it has to be addressed by everyone in our therapy group. IMO as long as they are not drect copies of someone else's efforts, all should be good.
BOC
 
Top