• New threads will not be visible until approved by a moderator.
  • Customize your forum experience with the xenForo-G-1-0 browser script.
    For additional information, see: Useful Custom Forum Script: xenForo-G-1-0
  • Welcome to the forum!
    You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
    Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
    Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
  • You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
    Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
    Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!
  • See: Humanitarian Assistance to Ukrainians

Celebrity Videos - cleaned

nudografias

nudografias

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
938
Reaction score
86
Last edited:
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
But you can't avoid the inevitable consequences of introducing a rule. If you don't intend to apply it retrospectively then posters of current material have a legitimate grievance. If you do intend to apply it retrospectively then much current material will have to be removed. Not applying a rule properly and comprehensively makes that rule an unfair and unjust nonsense.
And as I asked previously, what about information that is no longer available? You're not the only one adept at research, and my knowledge and memory of the entertainment and fashion industries is fairly extensive but even I struggle with and even fail to complete many identifications. So we would have to prohibit the posting of and the removal of material the information of which cannot be determined. That is the inevitable consequence of introducing a hard and fast rule.
Again, this is community forum. Not Getty. It is ar better to lead by example and demonstrate a better way and a more helpful habit. Not everyone will follow but more will than won't.
I note that you wrote "I can give instructions on how to easily determine even ancient pictures", and yet rather than do that straight away in the Discussion forum, explaining how much easier it would make finding material and determining duplication, you come to this section and propose a rule that everyone must obey.
How "respectful" and un-dictator-like.
BOC
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
"Many of them have never even read the rules, and only know it when they get a warning."
Yet you want to implement and enforce a new rule that can't possibly apply retrospectively and would need so many qualifications as to render it impotent and meaningless.
"The easiest way that anyone can do is to immediately search for the same photo on Google Images"
So that implementation of rocket science was well worth waiting for and probably never occurred to anyone ever.
Sorry, Old Horse, but you're making my points for me. The more we examine this as a propostion, the more futile an exercise it becomes.
Lead by example in including all possible information you have when you post. Check manually for duplicates as everyone else has to do, and suck it up. You can't force through an impossible legislation that will alienate half the membership and take away their enjoyment of participation for your own convenience.



gakon said:
I thought a Discussion forum is for news, etc. So I put here. If this is the problem, move it to the correct section.

Nobody has nobody to listen. I turned attention to personal messages, some posters who are very active. Everyone, but everyone, they say they will, but not...And I'm sure they do not read. Many of them have never even read the rules, and only know it when they get a warning.

Btw, the easiest way that anyone can do is to immediately search for the same photo on Google Images. For others need a little more patience.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
349
A] they are entirely different frames of the same photo-op. If we delete these we have to start deleting and disallowing a ton of similar posts.
B] They aren't "LQ and cropped version of pics in post above". They just haven't been so ineptly blown up that they've become pixelated, as the previous post has.
Two points to strongly underline in red pen.
1] I really do wish some of these fuckwits would grasp that "big" isn't necessarily "HQ"
2] This endless pissing contest between imagetwist posters is beginning to get on my nads, as is this new trend of trying to manipulate the moderators into getting rid of the competition.
I don't mind people thinking they are smarter than me as long as they have some basis for that assumption. This inneptitude is just an insult. My mood isn't improved by the fact that every time I click on one of these bloody images my adblock, pop up blocker and firewall light up like a flipping Christmas tree. I never had an issue with malware till I started moderating. That can't be a coincidence.
Ah well. Rant over. Soapbox dismounted.
BOC
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Teenmushi
Emma / Em Indica
Replies
8
Views
7K
LiCeK
LiCeK
LarryO
  • Locked
  • Sticky
FORUM RULES
Replies
0
Views
5K
LarryO
LarryO
Teenmushi
Hyley Winters
Replies
6
Views
6K
LiCeK
LiCeK
Teenmushi
Lila / Lilah / Lila Love / LilaxoLove
Replies
10
Views
10K
Teenmushi
Teenmushi
Teenmushi
Claire Roos
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
LiCeK
LiCeK
Top